In light of the mailing list discussion about buffer alignment in distributed stream construction (see ARROW-1343 and the mailing list discussion), I am going to hold off on cutting an RC until we can reach a resolution there. Otherwise things seem to be in good shape.
Thanks Wes On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi all, > > It looks like we should be able to close out 0.6.0 issues today and > cut a release candidate tomorrow if there are no objections. Please > take a moment to complete any code reviews for patches that should go > in. We have a number of Java library dependency upgrades pending, do > these need to go in? > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/929 > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/873 > > There is another Java patch that needs to be merged if someone could review: > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/898 > > There are a handful of C++ or Python patches pending, and I'll be > opening a few more PRs today; any code reviews would be appreciated. > > Thanks > Wes > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Siddharth Teotia <siddha...@dremio.com> wrote: >> Reviewed https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/915 for ARROW-1296 >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Siddharth Teotia <siddha...@dremio.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I will review it by EOD. >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Li Jin <ice.xell...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On the Java side I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1296, >>>> which is small bug fix. >>>> >>>> If someone help review it would be great. Else if it doesn't get reviewed >>>> by 0.6 rc cut, we can take it off 0.6 release. >>>> >>>> Li >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> > hi all, >>>> > >>>> > If there are no problems with the Plasma IP Clearance, I would like to >>>> > cut a release candidate for 0.6.0 at the beginning of next week. There >>>> > are a handful of issues pending on the Java and C++ side that I'll be >>>> > working to complete over the next several days. Please keep an eye on >>>> > the release page on JIRA: >>>> > >>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088 >>>> > >>>> > There are a number of outstanding Java patches; if you would like to >>>> > include any of these in the 0.6.0 release, could someone review? >>>> > >>>> > Thanks, >>>> > Wes >>>> > >>>> > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > > It seems that ARROW-1282 is causing some users problems. We have the >>>> > > option of making a 0.5.1 release, but given how much work has reached >>>> > > master (or is about to reach master) I would be in favor of >>>> > > accelerating 0.6.0, cutting a release candidate within the next couple >>>> > > of days. We could aim for another release within 2-3 weeks after >>>> > > completing the Plasma IP clearance. >>>> > > >>>> > > Thoughts? >>>> > > >>>> > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote: >>>> > >> Hello, >>>> > >> >>>> > >> from my side we're mostly fine for a 0.6.0 release. Currently I'm >>>> facing >>>> > >> a problem with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1302 in >>>> the >>>> > >> 0.5.0 OSX wheels. We need to fix this before 0.6.0. Also I would >>>> like to >>>> > >> look a bit more into the jemalloc issues that came up with 0.5.0 to >>>> get >>>> > >> some of them solved in the next release. >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Uwe >>>> > >> >>>> > >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017, at 04:55 PM, Wes McKinney wrote: >>>> > >>> hi all, >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> We're already 40 patches into the next Arrow version. I just created >>>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1297 as a tracking >>>> issue >>>> > >>> so that any blocking issues can be tracked as we push forward to >>>> 0.6.0 >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> You can track the status of the release here (accessible from the >>>> > >>> "Projects" tab --> Releases in JIRA): >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088 >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> We don't have any more data types slated for integration testing for >>>> > >>> this release, but it might be nice to try to finish one or more of >>>> > >>> them in the next week or two: >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> - Fixed size binary >>>> > >>> - Fixed size lists >>>> > >>> - Decimal >>>> > >>> - Union >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> As far as timeline for 0.6.0, I would like to push for an RC the >>>> week >>>> > >>> of 8/14 at latest (assuming we are ready to ship the Plasma C++ >>>> code), >>>> > >>> reducing scope if needed. Any contributions of code, documentation, >>>> or >>>> > >>> JIRA prioritization would be much appreciated. >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> Thanks, >>>> > >>> Wes >>>> > >>>> >>> >>>
