Reviewed https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/915 for ARROW-1296
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Siddharth Teotia <siddha...@dremio.com> wrote: > I will review it by EOD. > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Li Jin <ice.xell...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On the Java side I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1296, >> which is small bug fix. >> >> If someone help review it would be great. Else if it doesn't get reviewed >> by 0.6 rc cut, we can take it off 0.6 release. >> >> Li >> >> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > hi all, >> > >> > If there are no problems with the Plasma IP Clearance, I would like to >> > cut a release candidate for 0.6.0 at the beginning of next week. There >> > are a handful of issues pending on the Java and C++ side that I'll be >> > working to complete over the next several days. Please keep an eye on >> > the release page on JIRA: >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088 >> > >> > There are a number of outstanding Java patches; if you would like to >> > include any of these in the 0.6.0 release, could someone review? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Wes >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > It seems that ARROW-1282 is causing some users problems. We have the >> > > option of making a 0.5.1 release, but given how much work has reached >> > > master (or is about to reach master) I would be in favor of >> > > accelerating 0.6.0, cutting a release candidate within the next couple >> > > of days. We could aim for another release within 2-3 weeks after >> > > completing the Plasma IP clearance. >> > > >> > > Thoughts? >> > > >> > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote: >> > >> Hello, >> > >> >> > >> from my side we're mostly fine for a 0.6.0 release. Currently I'm >> facing >> > >> a problem with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1302 in >> the >> > >> 0.5.0 OSX wheels. We need to fix this before 0.6.0. Also I would >> like to >> > >> look a bit more into the jemalloc issues that came up with 0.5.0 to >> get >> > >> some of them solved in the next release. >> > >> >> > >> Uwe >> > >> >> > >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017, at 04:55 PM, Wes McKinney wrote: >> > >>> hi all, >> > >>> >> > >>> We're already 40 patches into the next Arrow version. I just created >> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1297 as a tracking >> issue >> > >>> so that any blocking issues can be tracked as we push forward to >> 0.6.0 >> > >>> >> > >>> You can track the status of the release here (accessible from the >> > >>> "Projects" tab --> Releases in JIRA): >> > >>> >> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088 >> > >>> >> > >>> We don't have any more data types slated for integration testing for >> > >>> this release, but it might be nice to try to finish one or more of >> > >>> them in the next week or two: >> > >>> >> > >>> - Fixed size binary >> > >>> - Fixed size lists >> > >>> - Decimal >> > >>> - Union >> > >>> >> > >>> As far as timeline for 0.6.0, I would like to push for an RC the >> week >> > >>> of 8/14 at latest (assuming we are ready to ship the Plasma C++ >> code), >> > >>> reducing scope if needed. Any contributions of code, documentation, >> or >> > >>> JIRA prioritization would be much appreciated. >> > >>> >> > >>> Thanks, >> > >>> Wes >> > >> > >
