On 2010-03-02, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Okay, let's reason this out... since tasks and types are Java objects > can we assume that a Java property "final" is unlikely enough to be > used that we can use it as a configuration "attribute"?
Agreed. An alternative could be anything that contains a dash or any other character that would be illegal in a Java method name (so you can't have a set-method for it). > Now, any id'd item would declare final=false if it wanted to be > augmentable. This would require changes in the way we handle > references, but would seem doable. +1 Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
