Okay, let's reason this out... since tasks and types are Java objects
can we assume that a Java property "final" is unlikely enough to be
used that we can use it as a configuration "attribute"? Now, any
id'd item would declare final=false if it wanted to be augmentable.
This would require changes in the way we handle references, but
would seem doable.
On Mar 1, 2010, at 11:22 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-02-25, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote:
I'd like to direct the Ant developers' attention to https://
issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48798 for discussion.
I'm with the other people in this thread who'd prefer to make this an
option that reference have to opt-in to so that not all references can
be augmented.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
