Xavier Hanin wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Maarten Coene <maarten_co...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Creating a 2.0.1 release is ok for me. I'm willing to create the release if
no-one else volunteers...
I've taken a quick look at the changes in JIRA, I think IVY-970 contains the
biggest change, but I think we can include it in the new release (or is it too
risky?)
I agree, I've reviewed the changes too and I think they are all ok to
be included in 2.0.1. IVY-970 is slightly bigger but only impact
buildnumber, and after a quick code review I don't expect any major
problem with it, so I'm fine to include it.
And maybe we should also try to fix IVY-987 in the 2.0.1 release to improve our
maven2 compatibility?
Indeed, this bug is giving bad feeling about Ivy maven 2
compatibility. I should be able to find some time this week to
investigate and hopefully find a fix. So if we all agree we could try
to plan making a release in a week or so, if this match your planned
availability Maarten.
+1 for a release, there are things that have been fixed like handling
the latest Xalan sha1; though that also implies a full beta test cycle
just to make sure everything seems stable
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
