On mercredi 11 février 2009 08:53:20 Xavier Hanin wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 2009-02-10, Xavier Hanin <xavier.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> On 2009-02-09, Nicolas Lalevée <nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org> wrote: > >>>>> So do I need to launch a vote for this Eclipse-packaging-fix release > >>>>> ? > >>> > >>> I'd create a minor version release (2.0.1 or even just 2.0.0.1) - and > >>> vote as on any release. > >> > >> A minor version release of what? Ivy? IvyDE? > > > > Whatever it is that needs its packaging to be changed. > > Well, in this case we need a new packaging of Ivy eclipse feature, > which is packaged when we release Ivy, so I guess we need to release > Ivy itself. And if we release a new minor version of Ivy, I think > people would be confused if we do not include some bug fixes which are > currently on trunk. So I think it's a good opportunity to release Ivy > 2.0.1, and discuss what we put in this release (what we merge from > trunk to 2.0.x branch). > > WDYT?
+1 I am confident to put not just bug fix, but also the improvements and new features in a new release, as the changes were not that big to make Ivy unstable. Nicolas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
