Le 11 nov. 08 à 10:49, Scheper, Erik-Berndt a écrit :
Hi,
Declaring ivyde as beta seems fine to me. I don't have many problems
with the latest version.
What about IVYDE-128 and IVYDE-130? These are currently in the 2.0
roadmap.
Although I must say that I have no idea how to reproduce IVYDE-130.
I certainly have never seen anything like it.
for IVYDE-128, see my comment, it is already working for maven
repositories, which is the main use case. Now it may exist some use
case for some broken Ivy repositories, but it would be simpler to fix
the repo I think, "qxo" (is it you Erik ?) should confirm it.
IVYDE-130: I have yet no idea how to fix it.
Then both are included in the 2.0 final roadmap, but it don't see the
necessity to have them in the beta.
As soon as enough people agree with the roadmap, I will update Jira
accordingly.
Nicolas
Regards,
Erik-Berndt
________________________________
Van: Maarten Coene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: ma 10-11-2008 23:24
Aan: Ant Developers List
Onderwerp: Re: IvyDE 2.0 roadmap
Sounds good to me
Maarten
----- Original Message ----
From: Nicolas Lalevée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List <dev@ant.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 11:15:48 PM
Subject: IvyDE 2.0 roadmap
I would like to discuss about the next release of IvyDE.
The last release of IvyDE was made 4 months ago, there are some
important bug fixes that make IvyDE a lot more stable, so I think it
is a good time to get an IvyDE release now.
Thought I don't think that that next release is enough tested to be
flagged as "2.0 final", I think a "beta" state is more appropriate,
there are still opened and unresolved bugs. And the current
implementation of the "resolve in workspace" is a little bit hacky.
I would see that release as a milestone in a stable 2.0 roadmap.
For that beta release, I would like to take time to include
IVYDE-120 (make IvyDE work in Eclipse 3.2), and also IVYDE-119
(little refactoring of the UI, maybe together with IVYDE-106 (choose
the configuration used during retrieve)).
After that beta out, I think we should focus then on a 2.0 final,
making every bugs fixed, having a correct "resolve in workspace"
implementation.
WDYT ?
Nicolas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer:
This message contains information that may be privileged or
confidential and is the property of Sogeti Nederland B.V. or its
Group members. It is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not
authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or
use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of
this message.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
