DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42838>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42838 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-10 03:08 ------- 1. yes, I am in favour of support for this. Anything that stops javac from holding on to 10MB structures, alongside the 13MB structures that RMIC likes to hold on two, would be welcome. 2. It would be implemented as a new adapter behind the javac facade, which already has support for msjvc, jikes, javac classic, javac modern. 3. the api implementation would have to use reflection so as to build on earlier JVMs, and to degrade gracefully. 4. it would need tests and documentation; tests that only run on java1.6+ 5. I would not make this the default; we'd leave it as is, maybe add a new adapter "java6", and one alongside "latest" that always tries to use the most modern adapter (i.e. on java7 it reserves the right to use something else) Contributions of code tests and docs welcome. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
