DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42838>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42838 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 03:32 ------- one question: why? Ant already has lots of support for the existing javac apis, to the extent that we're actually used behind the scenes in a lot of places. What is so compelling about the new API that we need to add a new implementation and the test cases to match? The only thing would make it compelling to me would be if non-forking javac would stop leaking very large (multi-megabyte) static data structures. Is there any discussion in that in the API? Whenever we reported that problem to sun in the past, it was always dismissed as a WONTFIX "you shouldnt be running javac in-process". -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
