DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40561>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40561 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-21 13:44 ------- (In reply to comment #5) Yes, I understand and I just want to mention that there is another bug (or undocumented behaviour). On my side, I have found a workaround immediately: 1) Never introduce dependencies inside the same property file. 2) Express dependent values in build files or separate property files. The resulting constraint for property files users is: Never use properties redefined locally. Instead, use their literal value (which is defined locally). These rules should work for anybody without introducing huge constraints. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
