DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40561>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40561 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-21 11:50 ------- (In reply to comment #2) I tested your example in verbose mode with Ant1.7Beta2 and I get the following: >ant -v Property "project.interfaces.prefix" has not been set Property "project.interfaces.suffix" has not been set Property "project.factories.suffix" has not been set Property "project.factories.suffix" has not been set [echo] interfaces.format={1}.model.${project.interfaces.prefix}{2}${project.interfaces.suffix} [echo] factories.format={1}.factory.{2}${project.factories.suffix} [echo] foo={1}.factory.{2}${project.factories.suffix} which is correct. What you get is very strange (and would be a bug IMHO). As Peter mentioned properties in a property file are first resolved among themselves (because the definitions are returned as a set and have no ordering) and only afterwards are resolved against the build's properties. There are two things you could try: 1. Strip the prefix from the names as Peter said. 2. Define the project.xxx properties separately in case you need these properties to be visible in more than one prefixed property file. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
