DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38458>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38458 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-02 09:50 ------- I am afraid not, This would cause so many Backword and Forward compatibly problems, it would not be funny. All most ant objects live in a Project context. A Project context provides a large number of servies - properties, location of build file, references, tasks/type etc. Just creating a project in a ant object constructor is not sufficient. One way to look at project would be as a kind of ejb container. Perhaps every task should enforce the need to have the project in the constructor. However ant objects normally do not enforce having the construtor make a valid object. Doing this would make xml -> java reflection configured objects impossible. In any case, ant code changes are *very* conservative. Normally a public method or constructor is not allowed to be removed or changed in new releases of ant. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
