DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38458>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38458 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-02 07:45 ------- > Hmm... at first I was like, what? But if there were a static > Project.DEFAULT_INSTANCE Project, whose only properties were System > properties, > etc... hmmm... I am totally not familiar with the Ant codebase, but... I was thinking the constructor would just do a setProject(new Project()); instead of me having to mutter the mystical incantation XSLTProcess process=new XSLTProcess(); process.setProject(new Project()); which is what I am doing now to get things working. Or as you suggest it could use a static Project instance, if that works better. It just seems to me that either 1) Every Task has a Project, in which case the Task class should enforce that or 2) a Project is optional, and subclasses of Task should not assume there is one. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
