On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My concern here is back to this: I would like an alternate syntax > for loading built-in antlibs (as I have made painfully clear).
Yes you have. And you have my support for a new protocol (in case I wasn't clear). > Since antlibs don't accept <import> AFAIK But <typedef>. You can have org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/antlib.xml with <antlib> <typedef resource="org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/defaults.properties"/> </antlib> as well as org/apache/tools/ant/types/antlib.xml with <antlib> <typedef resource="org/apache/tools/ant/types/defaults.properties"/> <typedef resource="org/apache/tools/ant/types/selectors/antlib.xml"/> <typedef resource="org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/conditions/antlib.xml"/> </antlib> and then even org/apache/tools/ant/antlib.xml with <antlib> <typedef resource="org/apache/tools/ant/types/antlib.xml"/> <typedef resource="org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/antlib.xml"/> </antlib> > I would hate to add the same resource (content) in >1 place, Of course. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
