--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Matt Benson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > My concern here is back to this: I would like an
> alternate syntax
> > for loading built-in antlibs (as I have made
> painfully clear).
>
> Yes you have. And you have my support for a new
> protocol (in case I
> wasn't clear).
Yep. The above was background for the point of not
wanting to add the same resource content multiple
times.
>
> > Since antlibs don't accept <import> AFAIK
>
> But <typedef>.
I forgot. :) That would be okay, and possibly even
best. I could go ahead and add the antlibs for
antlib:org.apache.tools.ant.types.resources.selectors
and if we can agree on a protocol then
resourceselectors.xml (e.g.) could typedef the antlib.
-Matt
[SNIP]
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!
http://travel.yahoo.com/p-travelguide
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
