DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22901>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22901 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-03 19:32 ------- A big problem here, again, is the fact the sensible way to process multiple targets specified via nested elements on a single ant(call) invocation is with single-check execution; otherwise multiple tasks could be used. Ordinarily, then, you have default target execution for the main Project and single-check execution for ant(call)-based Project instances. The parallel case and its threadcount limitations is a good one; executor inheritance would definitely be useful here, but we end up with this conflict. At this point the only compromise I see is to inherit the executor, with the rule being that nested targets will cause a single-check executor to be used in place of a default executor; or a new keep-going/single-check executor to be used in place of a keep-going executor; but no other combination of circumstances will result in such a substitution. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
