DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22901>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22901 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-03 17:24 ------- The Ant task and its derivatives use the SingleCheckExecutor for simplicity's sake because it gives all the behavior they need. Adding the ability to specify a particular Executor would not be that difficult but it doesn't seem like much more than clutter, really. In this particular instance, it strikes me as odd that you want/need to execute a target without its dependencies. If so, why do you have the dependencies? Ordinarily you declare dependencies and the tasks decide whether they have any work to do, so that your build incurs as little work as possible. If you have two tasks and sometimes you want to execute one based on the other you could impose that structure with helper targets. It sounds as though restructuring your buildfiles could be immensely helpful. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
