[... skipping the name discussion since I'm responsible for many misnomers in Ant already 8-) ...]
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So that instead of declaring which properties do NOT > remain, we declare which properties DO remain. What would be the gain? How would this simplify things? Less pollution of the global property name space? I wouldn't expect people to use any let/scope/whatever container unless they really wanted local properties - but that doesn't mean they want all their properties to be local. I'm not sure which behavior would be more common and thus should be the default. Any other benefits? Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
