Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Nicer? Maybe. I still think a special task container would be cleaner since it provided explicit scoping and might even help us route around the "custom PropertyHelpers problem". Something like
<target name="example"> <let> <local name="prop" value="a local value"/> <echo>prop is ${prop}</echo> </let> </target>
Ok, I am modifying the local patch to do:
<target name="example">
<let>
<localproperty name="prop" value="a local value"/>
<echo>prop is ${prop}</echo>
</let>
</target>
So, Task, Target, Parallel do not get changed.
I also think that the nested localproperty for the macrodef task can be dropped
initially. It would be easier to explain just one container for local properties/
Peter
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
