> From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- Magesh Umasankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Steve Loughran <steve_l () iseran ! com> > > Date: 2004-06-17 9:27:18 > > > > > I am now convinced we need local properties; > > without > > > it macrodef doesnt work fully. > > > > Why do you need them? I typically append an > > attribute > > value to a property name to get the unique property > > that > > I want. > > > I cringe at the thought of the number of "unique > properties" that could be floating about resulting > from this...
But do you really care? It is a computer for heaven sake :-) As long as it does not interfere with yours why would it be an issue? On the other hand, if people are writing complicated recursive macrodefs, well it is not like an everyday thing or is it. Jose Alberto --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
