On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> True, but I doubt many people will use properties called for > example: > > "#ant.task.macrodef.example.let####1" 8-) What if they do? Hypothetical, I know. Still we'd be carying them around (and passing them down to subbuilds with inheritall="true"). > My problem with the real local properties is that I think they will > require a lot of work and thought before we can have something > really rubust. Quite possible. > If, as we have done in the past, put out there something that we > have not really considered all the concequences properly, we will > finish with all sorts of backward compatibility issues when we find > the drawbacks (or the users find them). It would not be the first > time this happens Of course not. > The payoff of general local properties seems quite limited, as far > as I can see. Have you found any compelling usage for them on their > own? No, *I* haven't. Others may have. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
