yep, spotted that.. thanks. Conor MacNeill wrote:
Aurele Venet wrote:
OK, I'll do that.... figured that another way to go about this is to add a get and set status method to the BuildException, with a default value of one.... not really needed to have a new exception, what do you think?
Peter Reilly wrote:
I think Matt has already committed something - check out the cvs mails.
Conor
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
_______________________________________________________________________
Quote: The surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the
universe is the fact that it has never tried to contact us.Aurele Vrata Venet
ESA/ESAC
European Space Astronomy Center
P.O. Box 50727, 28080 Madrid - SPAIN
Tel: +34 91 81 31 331 Fax: +34 91 81 31 322
Ext: 322 ;
_______________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
