Aurele Venet wrote:
OK, I'll do that.... figured that another way to go about this is to add a get and set status method to the BuildException, with a default value of one.... not really needed to have a new exception, what do you think?
Peter Reilly wrote:
I think Matt has already committed something - check out the cvs mails.
Conor
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
