--- Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Since the current behavior does not really qualify > as > > a bug, it is not safe to assume that a change to > the > > default behavior of a task would not break > someone's > > build. > > OK, why would a change in an output message would > break > anyones build. We do change things when spellings > are incorrect.
point taken, however I was thinking along the lines of parsing log output and how a simple change to the output of a task could break, for example, an Ant test case. > I would suggest just logging this message as debug > when changes = 0. > I agree that would have made more sense from the beginning, not to disparage anyone however since I probably wouldn't have thought of it either. > Maybe I am wrong, but I would like to see a > meaningful example. > Maybe not one other than the fact that we don't know how people use log output. -Matt __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
