Dominique Devienne wrote:

Does this warrant a 1.6.1? I'm actually quite stuck because of this bug....



This bug is impacting the most salient feature of ant 1.6.0, in the core of ant, so it is
important.


Do we want to fix other bugs in 1.6.1 ?

What do you think ?

Dominique : can you use a patched version of ant 1.6.0 until we provide an official new release ?

Antoine

I've been making extensive use of namespaces in my builds based on beta1
--DD



-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks for the report.
Yes, the handling of the ant namespace is incorrect due
to a change between 1.6beta3 and 1.6.0.
I have placed a fix now.
Peter

Dominique Devienne wrote:



Just starting updating from Ant 1.6 beta1 to 1.6 official,
and I've having a bad surprise. It seems there's a problem
handling the default Ant namespace when explicitly specified,
or when used as the default namespace, at least for the <tstamp>
task.

Have I doing something wrong??? --DD









--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to