Does this warrant a 1.6.1? I'm actually quite stuck because of this bug....

I've been making extensive use of namespaces in my builds based on beta1!

--DD

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Thanks for the report.
> Yes, the handling of the ant namespace is incorrect due
> to a change between 1.6beta3 and 1.6.0.
> I have placed a fix now.
> Peter
> 
> Dominique Devienne wrote:
> 
> >Just starting updating from Ant 1.6 beta1 to 1.6 official,
> >and I've having a bad surprise. It seems there's a problem
> >handling the default Ant namespace when explicitly specified,
> >or when used as the default namespace, at least for the <tstamp>
> >task.
> >
> >Have I doing something wrong??? --DD

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to