[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If macrodef attribute are to be implements as substitutions, what
should be the notation? (where x is the attribute name)
[ ] as ${x} (look like ant properties) confusion with 'real'
properties
[ ] as $(x) to close to A
[ ] as @x I miss the brackets
[ ] as ${attribute:x} too long
[X] as @{x} ok, close to A but seeable
different
[ ] some thing else nothing in my mind to that
Has someone ruled out $${x}? Or does that conflict with
using $$ as some kind of escape sequence for $?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
