I know that Canoo WebTest uses %{x} as its own variable substitution.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 12:50 PM
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] macrodef - do attributes as properties or
> substitutions
>
>
> Another non committer here.
> I don't like $(x) because it looks too much like ${x}, although I
> suppose I could get used to that. Therfore, I am drawn to
> @{x}. ${attribute:x} is possible but way too much typing for
> my taste.
> Abbreviated to ${att:x} or ${attrib:x} my negativity level goes down
> accordingly.
>
> Before "voting", though, could someone list all the conflicting usages
> with other systems that ant must interface with.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 12:10 PM
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] macrodef - do attributes as properties or
> substitutions
>
>
> OK, how do we want to implement <macrodef> attributes:
> current
> [ ] as textual substitution ~ 4
> [ ] as "real" Ant properties ~ 2
>
> undecided ~ 1
>
> If macrodef attribute are to be implements as substitutions,
> what should
> be the notation? (where x is the attribute name)
>
> [ ] as ${x} (look like ant properties)
> [ ] as $(x)
> [ ] as @x
> [ ] as ${attribute:x}
> [ ] as @{x}
> [ ] some thing else
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
