On Friday 03 October 2003 15:54, Dominique Devienne wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jan Schroeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > What about creating a container task instead. > > Like: > > > > <nofail failureproperty="part.failed"> > > <patch .../> > > <echo ../> > > <antcall /> > > </nofail> > > > > That way all tasks automatically have something like "failonerror" + you > > actually know if the part failed and can take an appropriate build path > > from here on. > > Not a bad idea! I would just make that: > > <sequential failonerror="false" failureproperty="pea.failed"> > <patch ... /> > <echo ... /> > <antcall ... /> > </sequential> > > No new task, but simply a very useful extension to an existing task > container. --DD
This whould make the seqential task actually useful.. Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
