I agree, it is a good option in my mind. +1 :)
Emmanuel ----- Message d'origine ----- De : "Jan Schroeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envoyé : vendredi 3 octobre 2003 16:38 Objet : failonerror; general solution > There are a few new entries in bugzilla regarding handling of > BuildExceptions. > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23540 > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23581 > > Also, some tasks already implement some "failonerror" attribute (e.g. > <java>). > > What about creating a container task instead. > Like: > > <nofail failureproperty="part.failed"> > <patch .../> > <echo ../> > <antcall /> > </nofail> > > That way all tasks automatically have something like "failonerror" + you > actually know if the part failed and can take an appropriate build path > from here on. > > > Jan > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- ----------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
