Hi, I would like to propose a release plan for voting : - features included in 1.6 : all the features currently present in head - freeze date for 1.6 branch : Monday, September 22 13:00 GMT - availability of ANT_16_B1 binaries : within one week of the freeze of the branch. The exact time will depend on whether I will have trouble with practical issues from the build down to the signing of the jar files to the update of the web site, of bugzilla, ... - release manager : myself
(I hope this is OK, although I am not a PMC member). So, if this release plan is voted, on Monday, September 22 I will create the ANT_16_BRANCH tag. The CVS Head will then become ant 1.7alpha Cheers, Antoine ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 2:08 PM Subject: Re: Getting 1.6 out the door > Peter is currently on vacation, I hope he'll be back soon enough to > chime in. > > On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > There will probably be a 1.6.1 release in between to clean up any > > issues we discover in 1.6 > > Maybe we should consequentyl call the first 1.6 release 1.6.0 then? > > > 2. antlib > > > > I think this should be in > > yes. > > > but I am not familiar with its state yet, > > I'm not happy with some code details but the overal functionality is > there. We should be able to properly document it and see whether we > all can agree that this is the antlib functionality we want. If we > agree on it, we should put it into 1.6 - changing implementation > details would be like fixing bugs IMHO. > > > nor do I think it has had enough testing > > Of course not. > > > Are we planning to antlib Ant's own optional jars? > > Not in 1.6(.0) IMHO. > > > In 1.7 I think we need to look at removing antlibs from the root > > loader when their dependent jars are not available in ANT_HOME/lib. > > Yes. > > > Comments? > > The permissions stuff is causing some problems and we need to get the > new Launcher tested in a wider audience. Gump doesn't use it, it > still uses Main as its entry point and switching it to use Launcher > will cause a lot of problems (if we do it right and don't cheat by > adding ant.jar to CLASSPATH, that is). > > Stefan > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]