Big thanks to Shahar for recutting this. +1 (binding) for PMC checks
- SVN - in Docker installation - Reproducible build - Licence - Signature - Checksums Regards, Rahul Vats On Wed, 1 Jul 2026 at 20:43, Amogh Desai <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 binding. > > - Checked SVN > - Checked reproducible package builds > - Checked licences > - Checked signatures > - Checked SHA512 checks > > Checked the md5sum for the source code of spark provider with my > changes and did some testing around it. Looks great still. > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 5:33 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks for re-cutting with the source artifact added. Re-ran the full > > PMC verification on the rerun RC: > > > > - SVN dev folder complete - all 6 providers (wheel + sdist + .asc + > > .sha512) plus the apache_airflow_providers-2026-06-26-source.tar.gz > > trio that was missing before. > > - SHA512: 13/13 OK. > > - GPG: 13/13 good signatures, all from your key > > (DAF549DB1C0B31D8BCE167506834BFD7959CB6D5, in KEYS), including the > > source tarball. > > - Reproducible build: 13/13 byte-for-byte identical, rebuilt from tag > > providers/2026-06-26 - both the source tarball and all 12 provider > > wheels/sdists. > > - RAT (apache-rat 0.18) on the unpacked source: 0 Unapproved, 0 Unknown. > > > > The source tarball reproduces byte-identical, so this clears my -1 > > from the original vote. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >
