+1 (binding) I have checked, - SVN - Reproducible package builds - Licence - Signature - Checksums
Best regards, Hussein Awala On Wed, Jul 1, 2026 at 10:22 AM Wei Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (binding), checked: > > - SVN > - in Docker installation > - Reproducible build > - Licence > - Signature > - Checksums > > Best regards, > Wei Lee > > Buğra Öztürk <[email protected]> 於 2026年7月1日週三 上午3:00寫道： > > > Hey Shahar, > > > > Thanks for amending the files! > > +1 (binding), I have checked SVN, In Docker installation, Reproducible > > package builds, Licence, Signature, Checksums. They look good. > > > > Best regards, > > Bugra Ozturk > > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 9:04 PM Shahar Epstein <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > I'm rerunning this vote > > > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/r32knty7pob6fy0wjqccbjwxd7w803xf> > > because > > > the previous RC was incomplete: the required ASF source release > artifact > > ( > > > apache-airflow-providers-2026-06-26-source.tar.gz, along with its .asc > > and > > > .sha512 files) was accidentally omitted from the dev distribution > > > directory. The missing artifacts have now been uploaded, so this vote > > > supersedes the previous one. > > > > > > If you have already voted in the previous vote, I'll appreciate if you > > > could vote here as well (PMC - please rerun the entire verification > > process > > > again). > > > > > > I am rerunning the vote for the Airflow Providers packages with release > > > preparation date 2026-06-26. This email is calling a vote on the > release, > > > which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on > 2026-07-02 > > > 19:00 UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. > > > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1. > > > > > > The packages included in this release, and the main reason for > including > > > them, are detailed as follows: > > > > > > - Spark - rc1 was rejected due to an ongoing refactoring effort; > that > > > refactor has since been completed. > > > - Kubernetes - bugs introduced by the move to kubernetes client v36 > in > > > the last release (10.18.0), fixed in this RC. > > > - Google - bug fix for the same kubernetes client v36 > incompatibility; > > > the fix is backward-compatible (works on client v35 and v36). > > > - FAB & Keycloak - revert the airflowctl changes released in the > last > > > wave (https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/68856). Keycloak > > > additionally includes a fix for missing Keycloak resources being > > > treated as > > > access-denied (#68951). > > > - Celery - adding a worker multiprocessing start-method config to > curb > > > the memory regression (https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/69015 > ). > > > Part of Airflow 3.3 readiness effort. > > > > > > Airflow Providers are available at: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/2026-06-26 > > > > > > *apache-airflow-providers-2026-06-26-source.tar.gz* is the full source > > > tarball of airflow repo - snapshot taken at the moment of provider's > > > release. > > > > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the convenience > python > > > "sdist" distributions that we publish in PyPI > > > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the convenience Python > > > "wheel" distributions that we publish in PyPI. > > > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members > > > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC > is > > > described in: > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors > > > > > > > > > Public keys are available at: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community > are > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > > > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release it. > > > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here > > > (unchanged from original vote): > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/69049 > > > > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the > RC > > > candidates. > > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the > > documentation > > > after the > > > RC candidates are released. > > > > > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links: > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-celery/3.21.0rc1/ > > > > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/10.18.1rc2/ > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-spark/6.2.0rc2/ > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/3.7.1rc1/ > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/22.2.1rc1/ > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-keycloak/0.8.1rc1/ > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Shahar Epstein > > > > > >
