Great work! We need this since too many PRs have contained AirflowException
recently.

On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 2:56 PM Shahar Epstein <[email protected]> wrote:

> Well done!
>
>
> Shahar
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2026, 17:37 Wei Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > It's been more than half a year since this topic was last brought up, and
> > the PR has finally been merged and backported! Now new AirflowException
> > will be blocked by the CI!
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/55416
> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/64992
> >
> > Best,
> > Wei
> >
> > Amogh Desai <[email protected]> 於 2025年9月15日週一 下午11:28寫道:
> >
> > > Thanks for taking this on, Wei.
> > >
> > > It is unfortunate that entirely removing AirflowException isn't easy
> but
> > > this is a
> > > good step ahead to halting any more occurrences intentionally /
> > > unintentionally.
> > >
> > > Reviewed your PRs :)
> > >
> > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > Amogh Desai
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 12:25 PM Wei Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Lazy consensus passed. Mark the 2 PRs as ready to review.
> > > >
> > > > Wei Lee <[email protected]> 於 2025年9月9日 週二 上午11:31寫道:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Following positive feedback on
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/5rv4tz0oc27bgr4khx0on0jz8fpxvh55,
> I
> > > > > propose a lazy consensus to avoid new direct *AirflowException*
> usage
> > > > > (i.e., *raise AirflowException*).
> > > > >
> > > > > Relevant PRs:
> > > > > * docs(contributing-docs): avoid raise AirflowException directly
> > #55420
> > > > > <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/55420>: adding this as the
> > > best
> > > > > practices in the contribution guide
> > > > > * build(prek-hook): Check whether new "raise AirflowException" is
> > added
> > > > > #55416 <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/55416>: adding a
> prek
> > > > hook
> > > > > to block "raise AirflowException"
> > > > >
> > > > > If there are no objections by Friday, the 12th of September 2025, 1
> > pm
> > > > > AoE, this will be considered accepted.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Wei Lee
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to