It's been more than half a year since this topic was last brought up, and the PR has finally been merged and backported! Now new AirflowException will be blocked by the CI!
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/55416 https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/64992 Best, Wei Amogh Desai <[email protected]> 於 2025年9月15日週一 下午11:28寫道： > Thanks for taking this on, Wei. > > It is unfortunate that entirely removing AirflowException isn't easy but > this is a > good step ahead to halting any more occurrences intentionally / > unintentionally. > > Reviewed your PRs :) > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > > > On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 12:25 PM Wei Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Lazy consensus passed. Mark the 2 PRs as ready to review. > > > > Wei Lee <[email protected]> 於 2025年9月9日 週二 上午11:31寫道： > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Following positive feedback on > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/5rv4tz0oc27bgr4khx0on0jz8fpxvh55, I > > > propose a lazy consensus to avoid new direct *AirflowException* usage > > > (i.e., *raise AirflowException*). > > > > > > Relevant PRs: > > > * docs(contributing-docs): avoid raise AirflowException directly #55420 > > > <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/55420>: adding this as the > best > > > practices in the contribution guide > > > * build(prek-hook): Check whether new "raise AirflowException" is added > > > #55416 <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/55416>: adding a prek > > hook > > > to block "raise AirflowException" > > > > > > If there are no objections by Friday, the 12th of September 2025, 1 pm > > > AoE, this will be considered accepted. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Wei Lee > > > > > >
