Sounds exciting. Thanks for sharing the proposal for the updated governance process here, Vikram!
On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 9:33 PM Vikram Koka via dev <[email protected]> wrote: > With respect to the thresholds, that's exactly the intent. > As we measure and publish, we will be able to determine the right > thresholds. > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 4:24 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have no more questions. I know the numbers will not be correct at the > > beginning and we will have to adjust it, but I think before we try, we > > won't know - so we have to start with something. A lot of decisions are > > eventually at the discretion of the PMC - and I think once we automate a > > lot of those dashboard, stats etc. we will gradually learn what makes > > sense as thresholds to look at. > > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 10:05 PM Vikram Koka via dev < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Oh, and for those who may be wondering how the dashboard metrics of > >> provider activity could potentially work, there is an early draft of an > >> activity tracker is on the Airflow 3.x wiki page > >> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+3.x> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 12:26 PM Vikram Koka <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Dear Airflowers, > >> > > >> > Following up the action item from the discussion in the dev call last > >> > week, I updated the AIP (Airflow Improvement Proposal) for the > >> > updated provider governance process. > >> > > >> > The summary of changes are: > >> > 1. Introduction of a "Mature" stage for Providers in addition to the > >> > proposed "Incubation", "Production", and "Attic / Deprecation" to > >> account > >> > for those integrations which are stable and therefore don't need to > have > >> > additional activity on a monthly basis. > >> > > >> > 2. Deferred to future possibilities, the idea of splitting the > Provider > >> > repo from the existing mono-repo, and also changing the release > >> > distribution policy. In other words, we will no longer be splitting > the > >> > provider repos from the existing mono-repo. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Provider+lifecycle+update+proposal > >> > > >> > I deliberately didn't move the existing sections, so that I could > >> preserve > >> > the comments in the discussion. > >> > > >> > Please review this updated version of the document. > >> > If there are no further concerns, I plan to bring this up for a vote > >> next > >> > week. > >> > > >> > Best regards, > >> > Vikram > >> > -- > >> > > >> > Vikram Koka > >> > Chief Strategy Officer > >> > Email: [email protected] > >> > > >> > > >> > <https://www.astronomer.io/> > >> > > >> > > >
