I have no more questions. I know the numbers will not be correct at the beginning and we will have to adjust it, but I think before we try, we won't know - so we have to start with something. A lot of decisions are eventually at the discretion of the PMC - and I think once we automate a lot of those dashboard, stats etc. we will gradually learn what makes sense as thresholds to look at.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 10:05 PM Vikram Koka via dev <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, and for those who may be wondering how the dashboard metrics of > provider activity could potentially work, there is an early draft of an > activity tracker is on the Airflow 3.x wiki page > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+3.x> > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 12:26 PM Vikram Koka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear Airflowers, > > > > Following up the action item from the discussion in the dev call last > > week, I updated the AIP (Airflow Improvement Proposal) for the > > updated provider governance process. > > > > The summary of changes are: > > 1. Introduction of a "Mature" stage for Providers in addition to the > > proposed "Incubation", "Production", and "Attic / Deprecation" to account > > for those integrations which are stable and therefore don't need to have > > additional activity on a monthly basis. > > > > 2. Deferred to future possibilities, the idea of splitting the Provider > > repo from the existing mono-repo, and also changing the release > > distribution policy. In other words, we will no longer be splitting the > > provider repos from the existing mono-repo. > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Provider+lifecycle+update+proposal > > > > I deliberately didn't move the existing sections, so that I could > preserve > > the comments in the discussion. > > > > Please review this updated version of the document. > > If there are no further concerns, I plan to bring this up for a vote next > > week. > > > > Best regards, > > Vikram > > -- > > > > Vikram Koka > > Chief Strategy Officer > > Email: [email protected] > > > > > > <https://www.astronomer.io/> > > >
