Closing the vote On Mon, 9 Sept 2024 at 17:40, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> There will be some "bridge" features. > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 8:28 AM Ryan Hatter > <ryan.hat...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > > > If there are no features, why wouldn't we follow semver here and release > > 2.10.x? > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 9:07 PM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > As discussed in > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/7jf12p2mk0nr5495f26r67gnpm3jq8oj I am > > > calling for a lazy consensus on using marking 2.11 as a bridge release > > with > > > the following ideas: > > > > > > > > > 1. It would only have bug fixes & deprecation warnings as a BRIDGE > > > release -- NO features. The exception is when adding something to > aid > > > Airflow 2 to 3 migration, for which there can be an explicit mailing > > > list > > > discussion > > > 2. We would release it after December so Airflow 3.0 features & > > removals > > > are more concrete > > > 3. We only release 2.11 if we have to — if most of the things we > have > > > removed already had deprecation warnings from many minor releases, > > then > > > it > > > might not be worth it. > > > > > > > > > The vote will be closed on Sun, 8th of Sep 2024, 3 am BST. > > > > > > Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC members and > Committer's > > > votes are considered binding. > > > > > > This is my +1. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Kaxil > > > > > >
