+1(binding)

czw., 5 wrz 2024, 08:10 użytkownik Scheffler Jens (XC-AS/EAE-ADA-T)
<jens.scheff...@de.bosch.com.invalid> napisał:

> Hi Kaxil,
>
> +1 binding. With the assumption that AIP-80 was voted I assume we planned
> to introduce the new templating early. This would be (in my eyes except we
> see other things we need to mark deprecated to need to add features for
> migration preparation) the demand for Airflow 2.11
>
> Jens
>
> Sent from Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> ________________________________
> From: Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2024 3:07:12 AM
> To: dev@airflow.apache.org <dev@airflow.apache.org>
> Subject: [VOTE] Airflow 2.11 as bridge release
>
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed in
>
> https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2F7jf12p2mk0nr5495f26r67gnpm3jq8oj&data=05%7C02%7CJens.Scheffler%40de.bosch.com%7C623825ced3b1402f128f08dccd477b5c%7C0ae51e1907c84e4bbb6d648ee58410f4%7C0%7C0%7C638610954111360904%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=73VEeNuUBzBonqcfFp9OAriXcUff6HF1BAB%2BMlRwnac%3D&reserved=0
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/7jf12p2mk0nr5495f26r67gnpm3jq8oj> I am
> calling for a lazy consensus on using marking 2.11 as a bridge release with
> the following ideas:
>
>
>    1. It would only have bug fixes & deprecation warnings as a BRIDGE
>    release -- NO features. The exception is when adding something to aid
>    Airflow 2 to 3 migration, for which there can be an explicit mailing
> list
>    discussion
>    2. We would release it after December so Airflow 3.0 features & removals
>    are more concrete
>    3. We only release 2.11 if we have to — if most of the things we have
>    removed already had deprecation warnings from many minor releases, then
> it
>    might not be worth it.
>
>
> The vote will be closed on Sun, 8th of Sep 2024, 3 am BST.
>
> Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC members and Committer's
> votes are considered binding.
>
> This is my +1.
>
> Regards,
> Kaxil
>

Reply via email to