+1 standard & core -- can't pick one! -1 under common On Mon, 19 Aug 2024 at 15:29, Vishnu Chilukoori <vish.chiluko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 essential or essentials > -1 under common > (non-binding) > > > -- > Regards, > Vishnu > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 7:12 AM Wei Lee <weilee...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Same here. > > > > 1. +1 essential/essentials > > 2. -1 under common > > > > Best, > > Wei > > > > > On Aug 19, 2024, at 9:54 PM, Bas Harenslak <b...@astronomer.io.INVALID> > > wrote: > > > > > > +1 for essential (saves one letter) > > > -1 under common (feels like that would lead to path convention > confusion) > > > > > > Bas > > > > > >> On 19 Aug 2024, at 15:40, Vincent Beck <vincb...@apache.org> wrote: > > >> > > >> Same here, > > >> > > >> +1 essential/essentials > > >> -1 under common > > >> > > >> Binding > > >> > > >> On 2024/08/19 13:38:38 Pavankumar Gopidesu wrote: > > >>> Yes, I agree with Jarek :) > > >>> > > >>> +1 essential or essentials > > >>> -1 under common > > >>> (non-binding) > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> Pavan > > >>> > > >>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 2:32 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> +1 essential (or essentials) > > >>>> -1 under common > > >>>> > > >>>> (binding) > > >>>> > > >>>> Sorry for a bit of modification here, but I think > > >>>> `apache-airflow-providers-essentials` (with `s` at the end) would be > > more > > >>>> appropriate - showing also that it's about various "essentials". But > > I am > > >>>> good with either. This is a nuance. > > >>>> > > >>>> J > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 3:25 PM rom sharon <r...@apache.org> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Migrate all operators/sensors from core to dedicated provider. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> *Discussion thread* > > >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/2dmlqkcmyomm4q7rrovygs6bw655zx07 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> This vote concerns two key decisions. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 1. Provider name selection, options are: > > >>>>> - essential > > >>>>> - standard > > >>>>> - builtin > > >>>>> - primary > > >>>>> - core > > >>>>> - base > > >>>>> - shared > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 2. Placement under common. should the provider be categorized under > > >>>> common > > >>>>> < > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/airflow/providers/common>. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> For the provider name, please cast your vote using the following > > format > > >>>>> > > >>>>> [ ] +1 <provider name> > > >>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion > > >>>>> [ ] -1 <provider name> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> For the second decision regarding placement under common, please > vote > > >>>> using > > >>>>> this format > > >>>>> > > >>>>> [ ] +1 under common > > >>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion under common > > >>>>> [ ] -1 under common > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only votes from committers > > and > > >>>> PMC > > >>>>> members are considered binding. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> The vote will run for 3 days and last until 2024-08-23 at 12 AM > UTC. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Please consider this as my own voting: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> *+1 essential* > > >>>>> *-1 under common* > > >>>>> *(binding)* > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > > > > > > > >
