+1 essential or essentials -1 under common (non-binding)
-- Regards, Vishnu On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 7:12 AM Wei Lee <weilee...@gmail.com> wrote: > Same here. > > 1. +1 essential/essentials > 2. -1 under common > > Best, > Wei > > > On Aug 19, 2024, at 9:54 PM, Bas Harenslak <b...@astronomer.io.INVALID> > wrote: > > > > +1 for essential (saves one letter) > > -1 under common (feels like that would lead to path convention confusion) > > > > Bas > > > >> On 19 Aug 2024, at 15:40, Vincent Beck <vincb...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> Same here, > >> > >> +1 essential/essentials > >> -1 under common > >> > >> Binding > >> > >> On 2024/08/19 13:38:38 Pavankumar Gopidesu wrote: > >>> Yes, I agree with Jarek :) > >>> > >>> +1 essential or essentials > >>> -1 under common > >>> (non-binding) > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Pavan > >>> > >>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 2:32 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 essential (or essentials) > >>>> -1 under common > >>>> > >>>> (binding) > >>>> > >>>> Sorry for a bit of modification here, but I think > >>>> `apache-airflow-providers-essentials` (with `s` at the end) would be > more > >>>> appropriate - showing also that it's about various "essentials". But > I am > >>>> good with either. This is a nuance. > >>>> > >>>> J > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 3:25 PM rom sharon <r...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Migrate all operators/sensors from core to dedicated provider. > >>>>> > >>>>> *Discussion thread* > >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/2dmlqkcmyomm4q7rrovygs6bw655zx07 > >>>>> > >>>>> This vote concerns two key decisions. > >>>>> > >>>>> 1. Provider name selection, options are: > >>>>> - essential > >>>>> - standard > >>>>> - builtin > >>>>> - primary > >>>>> - core > >>>>> - base > >>>>> - shared > >>>>> > >>>>> 2. Placement under common. should the provider be categorized under > >>>> common > >>>>> < > https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/airflow/providers/common>. > >>>>> > >>>>> For the provider name, please cast your vote using the following > format > >>>>> > >>>>> [ ] +1 <provider name> > >>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion > >>>>> [ ] -1 <provider name> > >>>>> > >>>>> For the second decision regarding placement under common, please vote > >>>> using > >>>>> this format > >>>>> > >>>>> [ ] +1 under common > >>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion under common > >>>>> [ ] -1 under common > >>>>> > >>>>> Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only votes from committers > and > >>>> PMC > >>>>> members are considered binding. > >>>>> > >>>>> The vote will run for 3 days and last until 2024-08-23 at 12 AM UTC. > >>>>> > >>>>> Please consider this as my own voting: > >>>>> > >>>>> *+1 essential* > >>>>> *-1 under common* > >>>>> *(binding)* > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > > > >
