Bump .. On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 6:26 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> One more +1 needed, please :) > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 1:39 PM Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) for daskexecutor, docker and odbc providers >> >> On Thu 14 Dec 2023 at 13:37, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: >> >> > A small reminder. Despite -1s on Google, databricks, i would love to >> have >> > some +1 on the remaining ones (daskexecutor, docker, odbc) - we could >> > release them now while we are iterating on the last remaining databricks >> > fix and release RC3 for the three removed. >> > >> > Need two PMC +1s, pretty please :) . >> > >> > J >> > >> > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 2:08 PM Wei Lee <weilee...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > -1 (non-binding) for the google and databricks providers. Sent >> > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36202 for fixing the google >> issue >> > > >> > > Best, >> > > Wei >> > > >> > > Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> 於 2023年12月13日 週三 下午6:34寫道： >> > > >> > > > Google and databricks will get RC3 (PRs to fix them are already >> > created). >> > > > I'd still love to have +1 PMC votes on the remaining 3 :) >> > > > >> > > > J >> > > > >> > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 1:59 PM Pankaj Singh < >> ags.pankaj1...@gmail.com >> > > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > -1 (non-binding) for google and databricks providers since bug a >> has >> > > been >> > > > > found. >> > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 3:45 PM Utkarsh Sharma >> > > > > <utkarsh.sha...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > -1 (non-binding) >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I looked into Databricks providers and the PR >> > > > > > <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32319> introduced >> breaking >> > > > > changes >> > > > > > I have added my concern in the comment >> > > > > > <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36161/files#r1425078748 >> >. >> > > > Also, >> > > > > I >> > > > > > don't think there is an easy way to make row objects >> serializable. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 12:28 PM Rahul Vats < >> > rah.sharm...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > -1 (non-binding) our example DAG failing for Google and >> > Databricks >> > > > > > > providers, We are working on fixes. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > - >> > > > > > >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/10.13.0rc2/ >> > > > > > > - >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/5.1.0rc2/ >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Regards, >> > > > > > > Rahul Vats >> > > > > > > 9953794332 >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 at 11:35, Phani Kumar < >> > > phani.ku...@astronomer.io >> > > > > > > .invalid> >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -1 non binding. We are finding failures in astro sdk DAGs >> after >> > > > using >> > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > databricks and google RC. >> > > > > > > > We are working on creating PRs for the fixes. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > FAILED >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> tests_integration/databases/databricks_tests/test_delta.py::test_delta_run_sql >> > > > > > > > - AttributeError: 'list' object has no attribute 'asDict' >> > > > > > > > FAILED >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> tests_integration/databases/databricks_tests/test_delta.py::test_delta_run_sql_with_parameters >> > > > > > > > - AttributeError: 'list' object has no attribute 'asDict' >> > > > > > > > FAILED >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> tests_integration/databases/databricks_tests/test_delta.py::test_delta_create_table_with_columns[delta] >> > > > > > > > - AssertionError: assert ['id', 'int', None] == >> > > Row(col_name='id', >> > > > > > > > data_type='int', comment=None) >> > > > > > > > Full diff: >> > > > > > > > - Row(col_name='id', data_type='int', comment=None) >> > > > > > > > + ['id', 'int', None] >> > > > > > > > ERROR >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> tests_integration/databases/databricks_tests/test_delta.py::test_create_table_from_select_statement[delta] >> > > > > > > > - airflow.exceptions.AirflowException: Databricks job >> failed. >> > Job >> > > > > info >> > > > > > > > ***'job_id': 438976959785934, 'run_id': 268958235083047, >> > > > > > > > 'creator_user_name': 'phani.ku...@astronomer.io', >> > > 'number_in_job': >> > > > > > > > 268958235083047, 'state': ***'life_cycle_state': >> 'TERMINATED', >> > > > > > > > 'result_state': 'FAILED', 'state_message': 'Workload failed, >> > see >> > > > run >> > > > > > > output >> > > > > > > > for details', 'user_cancelled_or_timedout': False***, >> 'task': >> > > > > > > > ***'spark_python_task': ***'python_file': >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> 'dbfs:/mnt/pyscripts/load_file__tmp_en0ra8imcxfee4sp8b9y4hzqj4bjy5y2fvgpo9gv0s3pzvmzqv1tfaza9.py'***, >> > > > > > > > 'cluster_spec': ***'existing_cluster_id': '***'***, >> > > > > 'cluster_instance': >> > > > > > > > ***'cluster_id': '***', 'spark_context_id': >> > > > '4902558347078657686'***, >> > > > > > > > 'start_time': 1702436831591, 'setup_duration': 1000, >> > > > > > > 'execution_duration': >> > > > > > > > 12000, 'cleanup_duration': 0, 'end_time': 1702436844777, >> > > > 'run_name': >> > > > > > > > 'Untitled', 'run_page_url': ' >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://dbc-9c390870-65ef.cloud.databricks.com/?o=4256138892007661#job/438976959785934/run/268958235083047 >> > > > > > > > ', >> > > > > > > > 'run_type': 'SUBMIT_RUN', 'attempt_number': 0, 'format': >> > > > > > 'SINGLE_TASK'*** >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 4:02 AM Jarek Potiuk < >> ja...@potiuk.com >> > > >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hey all, >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > [Filling-in for Elad, who had no time to do it this time] >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. >> This >> > > > email >> > > > > > is >> > > > > > > > > calling a vote on the release, >> > > > > > > > > which will last for 24 hours - which means that it will >> end >> > on >> > > > > > December >> > > > > > > > 13, >> > > > > > > > > 2023 22:00 PM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been >> > > > received. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Following our processes, this is an accelerated vote >> taking >> > > into >> > > > > > > account >> > > > > > > > > that the RC1 version has been tested and it only contains >> > > > > incremental >> > > > > > > > > changes. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > This release contains fixes to issues found in rc1 in >> google, >> > > > > docker, >> > > > > > > > odbc, >> > > > > > > > > databricks providers and the last (after scheduling for >> > > > > > > > > removal) daskexecutor provider release. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Airflow Providers are available at: >> > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the >> binary >> > > > > > > > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" >> > for >> > > > the >> > > > > > > > provider >> > > > > > > > > packages. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary >> > > > > > > > > Python "wheel" release. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to >> > test >> > > > this >> > > > > > RC >> > > > > > > is >> > > > > > > > > described in: >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Public keys are available at: >> > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve >> > > > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion >> > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of >> the >> > > > > community >> > > > > > > are >> > > > > > > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with >> "(non-binding)". >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' >> > string. >> > > > > > > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without >> modifying >> > > > > > > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is >> kept >> > > > here: >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36194 >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > You can find packages as well as detailed changelog >> following >> > > the >> > > > > > below >> > > > > > > > > links: >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-daskexecutor/1.1.1rc2/ >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/10.13.0rc2/ >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/5.1.0rc2/ >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-docker/3.9.0rc2/ >> > > > > > > > > >> > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-odbc/4.3.0rc2/ >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Cheers, >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > J. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
