Google and databricks will get RC3 (PRs to fix them are already created). I'd still love to have +1 PMC votes on the remaining 3 :)
J On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 1:59 PM Pankaj Singh <ags.pankaj1...@gmail.com> wrote: > -1 (non-binding) for google and databricks providers since bug a has been > found. > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 3:45 PM Utkarsh Sharma > <utkarsh.sha...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > > > -1 (non-binding) > > > > I looked into Databricks providers and the PR > > <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/32319> introduced breaking > changes > > I have added my concern in the comment > > <https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/36161/files#r1425078748>. Also, > I > > don't think there is an easy way to make row objects serializable. > > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 12:28 PM Rahul Vats <rah.sharm...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > -1 (non-binding) our example DAG failing for Google and Databricks > > > providers, We are working on fixes. > > > > > > - > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/10.13.0rc2/ > > > - > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/5.1.0rc2/ > > > > > > Regards, > > > Rahul Vats > > > 9953794332 > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 at 11:35, Phani Kumar <phani.ku...@astronomer.io > > > .invalid> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > -1 non binding. We are finding failures in astro sdk DAGs after using > > the > > > > databricks and google RC. > > > > We are working on creating PRs for the fixes. > > > > > > > > FAILED > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tests_integration/databases/databricks_tests/test_delta.py::test_delta_run_sql > > > > - AttributeError: 'list' object has no attribute 'asDict' > > > > FAILED > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tests_integration/databases/databricks_tests/test_delta.py::test_delta_run_sql_with_parameters > > > > - AttributeError: 'list' object has no attribute 'asDict' > > > > FAILED > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tests_integration/databases/databricks_tests/test_delta.py::test_delta_create_table_with_columns[delta] > > > > - AssertionError: assert ['id', 'int', None] == Row(col_name='id', > > > > data_type='int', comment=None) > > > > Full diff: > > > > - Row(col_name='id', data_type='int', comment=None) > > > > + ['id', 'int', None] > > > > ERROR > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tests_integration/databases/databricks_tests/test_delta.py::test_create_table_from_select_statement[delta] > > > > - airflow.exceptions.AirflowException: Databricks job failed. Job > info > > > > ***'job_id': 438976959785934, 'run_id': 268958235083047, > > > > 'creator_user_name': 'phani.ku...@astronomer.io', 'number_in_job': > > > > 268958235083047, 'state': ***'life_cycle_state': 'TERMINATED', > > > > 'result_state': 'FAILED', 'state_message': 'Workload failed, see run > > > output > > > > for details', 'user_cancelled_or_timedout': False***, 'task': > > > > ***'spark_python_task': ***'python_file': > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 'dbfs:/mnt/pyscripts/load_file__tmp_en0ra8imcxfee4sp8b9y4hzqj4bjy5y2fvgpo9gv0s3pzvmzqv1tfaza9.py'***, > > > > 'cluster_spec': ***'existing_cluster_id': '***'***, > 'cluster_instance': > > > > ***'cluster_id': '***', 'spark_context_id': '4902558347078657686'***, > > > > 'start_time': 1702436831591, 'setup_duration': 1000, > > > 'execution_duration': > > > > 12000, 'cleanup_duration': 0, 'end_time': 1702436844777, 'run_name': > > > > 'Untitled', 'run_page_url': ' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://dbc-9c390870-65ef.cloud.databricks.com/?o=4256138892007661#job/438976959785934/run/268958235083047 > > > > ', > > > > 'run_type': 'SUBMIT_RUN', 'attempt_number': 0, 'format': > > 'SINGLE_TASK'*** > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 4:02 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > > > [Filling-in for Elad, who had no time to do it this time] > > > > > > > > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email > > is > > > > > calling a vote on the release, > > > > > which will last for 24 hours - which means that it will end on > > December > > > > 13, > > > > > 2023 22:00 PM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. > > > > > > > > > > Following our processes, this is an accelerated vote taking into > > > account > > > > > that the RC1 version has been tested and it only contains > incremental > > > > > changes. > > > > > > > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1. > > > > > > > > > > This release contains fixes to issues found in rc1 in google, > docker, > > > > odbc, > > > > > databricks providers and the last (after scheduling for > > > > > removal) daskexecutor provider release. > > > > > > > > > > Airflow Providers are available at: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ > > > > > > > > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary > > > > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the > > > > provider > > > > > packages. > > > > > > > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary > > > > > Python "wheel" release. > > > > > > > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members > > > > > > > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this > > RC > > > is > > > > > described in: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors > > > > > > > > > > Public keys are available at: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > > > > > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the > community > > > are > > > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > > > > > > > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. > > > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying > > > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release. > > > > > > > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here: > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/36194 > > > > > > > > > > You can find packages as well as detailed changelog following the > > below > > > > > links: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-daskexecutor/1.1.1rc2/ > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/10.13.0rc2/ > > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/5.1.0rc2/ > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-docker/3.9.0rc2/ > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-odbc/4.3.0rc2/ > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > J. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
