I got some good feedback on the wording. Anyone else would like to chime in?

https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/27262

J.

On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 9:51 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
> BTW. I spoke To Andrey (AKA @Taragolis) and I think (and Andrey agrees) he 
> would be a great member of the Triage team.
>
> PR: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/27278
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 9:04 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Losing these folks is a bad experience for them but also for us because we 
>> > lost perhaps a great future contributor/committer/triager.
>>
>> Cannot agree more -  that this is what I would really like to avoid !
>> Pretty much Every time we lose someone passionate who loves our
>> product and would be a good contributor (even just small doc changes)
>> we lose an opportunity to improve Airflow.
>>
>> There is one watchout though (and one that it is difficult to make
>> judgment on) - some of those users we "lost" would be a huge energy
>> drain on the community rather than improvement. I think - with such an
>> influx of issues/questions/discussions/requests it's easy to get
>> yourself too much dragged into useless conversations and it's a bit of
>> skill to judge when it is better to lose someone rather than drag the
>> conversation forward.
>>
>> Maybe it would be worth updating the docs with a comment about being
>> assertive as a triager.
>>
>> J
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 7:56 PM Daniel Standish
>> <daniel.stand...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> 3. I am also getting a true sense of just how overwhelming the influx of 
>> >> Issues, PRs and Discussions is. I have come across several folks who 
>> >> submitted PRs and never got feedback and then left the community. Losing 
>> >> these folks is a bad experience for them but also for us because we lost 
>> >> perhaps a great future contributor/committer/triager. We certainly need 
>> >> all the help we can get on this front, for reviewing, providing feedback 
>> >> and ultimately merging folks' contributions.
>> >
>> > Yeah that's very sad and a very important point.
>> >

Reply via email to