dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.18.0 based on 1.18.0rc1 Jed Cunningham
• [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.0.3 from 3.0.3rc2 & Task SDK 1.0.3 from 1.0.3rc2 Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.0.3 from 3.0.3rc2 & Task SDK 1.0.3 from 1.0.3rc2 Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.0.3 from 3.0.3rc2 & Task SDK 1.0.3 from 1.0.3rc2 Marcin Szymański
  • [CANCELLED][VOTE] Release Airflow 3.0.3 from 3.0.3rc2 & Task SDK 1.0.3 from 1.0.3rc2 Kaxil Naik
• [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Migrate Provider Packages to use `BaseHook` via version_compat Amogh Desai
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Migrate Provider Packages to use `BaseHook` via version_compat Amogh Desai
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Migrate Provider Packages to use `BaseHook` via version_compat Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Migrate Provider Packages to use `BaseHook` via version_compat Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Migrate Provider Packages to use `BaseHook` via version_compat Amogh Desai
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Migrate Provider Packages to use `BaseHook` via version_compat Jarek Potiuk
• [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 03, 2025 Elad Kalif
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 03, 2025 Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 03, 2025 Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 03, 2025 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 03, 2025 Amogh Desai
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 03, 2025 Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on July 03, 2025 Elad Kalif
• [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.0.3 from 3.0.3rc1 & Task SDK 1.0.3 from 1.0.3rc1 Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.0.3 from 3.0.3rc1 & Task SDK 1.0.3 from 1.0.3rc1 Marcin Szymański
  • [CANCELLED][VOTE] Release Airflow 3.0.3 from 3.0.3rc1 & Task SDK 1.0.3 from 1.0.3rc1 Kaxil Naik
• [Meeting Notes] Airflow 3 dev call - 26 June 2025 Vikram Koka
• Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Shahar Epstein
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Jens Scheffler
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Kaxil Naik
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Amogh Desai
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Amogh Desai
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Jens Scheffler
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Jens Scheffler
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Amogh Desai
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Amogh Desai
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Amogh Desai
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Amogh Desai
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: Code sharing between Airflow Core and Task SDK - how do we achieve it Ash Berlin-Taylor
• Discuss: new option [secrets]backend_order Anton Nitochkin
  • Re: Discuss: new option [secrets]backend_order Amogh Desai
  • Re: Discuss: new option [secrets]backend_order Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: Discuss: new option [secrets]backend_order Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Discuss: new option [secrets]backend_order Amogh Desai
  • Re: Discuss: new option [secrets]backend_order Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Discuss: new option [secrets]backend_order Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Discuss: new option [secrets]backend_order Elad Kalif
  • Re: Discuss: new option [secrets]backend_order Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Discuss: new option [secrets]backend_order Elad Kalif
  • Re: Discuss: new option [secrets]backend_order Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Discuss: new option [secrets]backend_order Amogh Desai
  • Re: Discuss: new option [secrets]backend_order Anton Nitochkin
  • Re: Discuss: new option [secrets]backend_order Jarek Potiuk
• [RESULT][VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Briana Okyere
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Ankit Chaurasia
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Amogh Desai
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Rahul Vats
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Amogh Desai
• [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Update `BaseOperator` imports for Airflow 3.0 compatibility Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Update `BaseOperator` imports for Airflow 3.0 compatibility Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Update `BaseOperator` imports for Airflow 3.0 compatibility Amogh Desai
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Update `BaseOperator` imports for Airflow 3.0 compatibility Aritra Basu
  • RE: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Update `BaseOperator` imports for Airflow 3.0 compatibility Blain David
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Update `BaseOperator` imports for Airflow 3.0 compatibility Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Update `BaseOperator` imports for Airflow 3.0 compatibility Amogh Desai
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Update `BaseOperator` imports for Airflow 3.0 compatibility Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Update `BaseOperator` imports for Airflow 3.0 compatibility Vikram Koka
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Update `BaseOperator` imports for Airflow 3.0 compatibility Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Update `BaseOperator` imports for Airflow 3.0 compatibility Kevin Yang
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Update `BaseOperator` imports for Airflow 3.0 compatibility Amogh Desai
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED / Contribution Opportunity] Update `BaseOperator` imports for Airflow 3.0 compatibility Jarek Potiuk
• [ANNOUNCE] Python 3.9 support has been dropped on main branch Elad Kalif
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Python 3.9 support has been dropped on main branch Amogh Desai
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Python 3.9 support has been dropped on main branch Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Python 3.9 support has been dropped on main branch Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Python 3.9 support has been dropped on main branch Vincent Beck
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Python 3.9 support has been dropped on main branch Kaxil Naik
• [HELP NEEDED][DISCUSSION] SQLAlchemy v2 support Dev iL
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED][DISCUSSION] SQLAlchemy v2 support Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED][DISCUSSION] SQLAlchemy v2 support Wei Lee
  • RE: Re: [HELP NEEDED][DISCUSSION] SQLAlchemy v2 support Dev-iL
  • Re: Re: [HELP NEEDED][DISCUSSION] SQLAlchemy v2 support Jarek Potiuk
  • RE: Re: [HELP NEEDED][DISCUSSION] SQLAlchemy v2 support Dev-iL
  • RE: [HELP NEEDED][DISCUSSION] SQLAlchemy v2 support Dev-iL
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED][DISCUSSION] SQLAlchemy v2 support Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [HELP NEEDED][DISCUSSION] SQLAlchemy v2 support Jarek Potiuk
• [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Phani Kumar
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Ankit Chaurasia
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Rahul Vats
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Pankaj Koti
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Zhe You Liu
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Shubham Raj
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Bishundeo, Rajeshwar
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Amogh Desai
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Tamara Fingerlin
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Josh Fell
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Bowrna Prabhakaran
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Karthikeyan
  • AW: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Scheffler Jens (XC-AS/EAE-ADA-T)
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Wei Lee
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Kevin Yang
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Atul Kumar Singh
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Aritra Basu
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Constance Martineau
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Vincent Beck
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Ambika Garg
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Hemkumar Chheda
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Vikram Koka
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Pierre Jeambrun
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Amogh Desai Shahar Epstein
• [VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Briana Okyere
  • Re: [VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Amogh Desai
  • Re: [VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Aritra Basu
  • Re: [VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Pierre Jeambrun
  • Re: [VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month kalyan reddy
  • Re: [VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Wei Lee
  • Re: [VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Tzu-ping Chung
  • Re: [VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Rahul Vats
  • Re: [VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month constance
  • Re: [VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Pankaj Koti
  • Re: [VOTE] June 2025 PR of the Month Buğra Öztürk
• [DISCUSS] Switching base Python container images to python-standalone ? Jarek Potiuk
  • RE: [DISCUSS] Switching base Python container images to python-standalone ? Damian Shaw
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Switching base Python container images to python-standalone ? Jarek Potiuk
  • RE: [DISCUSS] Switching base Python container images to python-standalone ? Damian Shaw
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Switching base Python container images to python-standalone ? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Switching base Python container images to python-standalone ? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Switching base Python container images to python-standalone ? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Switching base Python container images to python-standalone ? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Switching base Python container images to python-standalone ? Aritra Basu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Switching base Python container images to python-standalone ? Jarek Potiuk
• [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release of June 20, 2025 Elad Kalif
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.17.0 Released Jed Cunningham
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Helm Chart version 1.17.0 Released Amogh Desai
• 🎟️ Check out the full program- Early Bird ends in 1 week! Teyza Ponce
• [REMINDER]: Airflow 3 Dev call on 26th June - agenda Vikram Koka
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airlfow 3.0.2 reference images rebuilt Jarek Potiuk
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Providers prepared on June 20, 2025 are released Elad Kalif
• [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Airflow Helm Chart 1.17.0 based on 1.17.0rc2 Jed Cunningham
• [Discussion] AIP-90: Should It Be Implemented in the Standard Provider or as a standalone provider? Wei Lee
  • Re: [Discussion] AIP-90: Should It Be Implemented in the Standard Provider or as a standalone provider? Vikram Koka
  • Re: [Discussion] AIP-90: Should It Be Implemented in the Standard Provider or as a standalone provider? Vikram Koka
  • Re: [Discussion] AIP-90: Should It Be Implemented in the Standard Provider or as a standalone provider? Wei Lee
  • Re: [Discussion] AIP-90: Should It Be Implemented in the Standard Provider or as a standalone provider? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [Discussion] AIP-90: Should It Be Implemented in the Standard Provider or as a standalone provider? Amogh Desai
  • Re: [Discussion] AIP-90: Should It Be Implemented in the Standard Provider or as a standalone provider? Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [Discussion] AIP-90: Should It Be Implemented in the Standard Provider or as a standalone provider? Wei Lee
  • Re: [Discussion] AIP-90: Should It Be Implemented in the Standard Provider or as a standalone provider? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [Discussion] AIP-90: Should It Be Implemented in the Standard Provider or as a standalone provider? Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [Discussion] AIP-90: Should It Be Implemented in the Standard Provider or as a standalone provider? Amogh Desai
  • Re: [Discussion] AIP-90: Should It Be Implemented in the Standard Provider or as a standalone provider? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [Discussion] AIP-90: Should It Be Implemented in the Standard Provider or as a standalone provider? Bas Harenslak
  • Re: [Discussion] AIP-90: Should It Be Implemented in the Standard Provider or as a standalone provider? Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [Discussion] AIP-90: Should It Be Implemented in the Standard Provider or as a standalone provider? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [Discussion] AIP-90: Should It Be Implemented in the Standard Provider or as a standalone provider? Wei Lee
  • Re: [Discussion] AIP-90: Should It Be Implemented in the Standard Provider or as a standalone provider? Wei Lee
• [DISCUSS] What should we cherry-pick ? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] What should we cherry-pick ? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] What should we cherry-pick ? Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [DISCUSS] What should we cherry-pick ? Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] What should we cherry-pick ? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] What should we cherry-pick ? Pavankumar Gopidesu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] What should we cherry-pick ? Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] What should we cherry-pick ? Wei Lee
  • Re: [DISCUSS] What should we cherry-pick ? Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [DISCUSS] What should we cherry-pick ? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] What should we cherry-pick ? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] What should we cherry-pick ? Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] What should we cherry-pick ? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] What should we cherry-pick ? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] What should we cherry-pick ? Amogh Desai
  • Re: [DISCUSS] What should we cherry-pick ? Jarek Potiuk
• [LAZY CONSENSUS] Dropping Python 3.9 support Elad Kalif

• Earlier messages
• Later messages