dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [DISCUSS] Task Result Caching Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Task Result Caching Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Task Result Caching Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Task Result Caching Ferruzzi, Dennis
• Creatng [email protected] Jarek Potiuk
• [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Elad Kalif
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Bishundeo, Rajeshwar
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Shivam Rastogi
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Shubham Raj
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Sameer Mesiah
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Aaron Chen
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Wei Lee
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Yeonguk Choo
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Amogh Desai
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Zhe-You(Jason) Liu
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira André Ahlert
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Piyush Mudgal
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Daniel Standish via dev
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Dheeraj Turaga
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Pankaj Koti via dev
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Srabasti Banerjee
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Oliveira, Niko
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC member: Niko Oliveira Pierre Jeambrun
• 💌 Discover the tracks and book with the Early Bird rate Teyza Ponce
• [RESULT][VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Zhe-You(Jason) Liu
• [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.2.2 from 3.2.2rc1 & Task SDK 1.2.2 from 1.2.2rc1 Rahul Vats
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.2.2 from 3.2.2rc1 & Task SDK 1.2.2 from 1.2.2rc1 Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.2.2 from 3.2.2rc1 & Task SDK 1.2.2 from 1.2.2rc1 Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.2.2 from 3.2.2rc1 & Task SDK 1.2.2 from 1.2.2rc1 Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.2.2 from 3.2.2rc1 & Task SDK 1.2.2 from 1.2.2rc1 Rahul Vats
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.2.2 from 3.2.2rc1 & Task SDK 1.2.2 from 1.2.2rc1 Shubham Raj
• [Meeting Notes] Airflow dev call - 7 May 2026 and Reminder for tomorrow Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: [Meeting Notes] Airflow dev call - 7 May 2026 and Reminder for tomorrow Blain David
• [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-19 Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-19 Aaron Chen
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-19 Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-19 Wei Lee
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-19 Vincent Beck
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-19 Oliveira, Niko
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-19 Amogh Desai
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-19 Sameer Mesiah
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-19 Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-19 Amogh Desai
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-19 Sameer Mesiah
• [DISCUSS] PR auto-triage recent stats (how do we do more reviews) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] PR auto-triage recent stats (how do we do more reviews) Jarek Potiuk
  • RE: [DISCUSS] PR auto-triage recent stats (how do we do more reviews) Sameer Mesiah
  • RE: Re: [DISCUSS] PR auto-triage recent stats (how do we do more reviews) Sameer Mesiah
  • Re: Re: [DISCUSS] PR auto-triage recent stats (how do we do more reviews) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Re: [DISCUSS] PR auto-triage recent stats (how do we do more reviews) Sameer Mesiah
  • Re: Re: [DISCUSS] PR auto-triage recent stats (how do we do more reviews) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Re: [DISCUSS] PR auto-triage recent stats (how do we do more reviews) Omkar P
  • Re: Re: [DISCUSS] PR auto-triage recent stats (how do we do more reviews) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Re: [DISCUSS] PR auto-triage recent stats (how do we do more reviews) Omkar P
  • Re: Re: [DISCUSS] PR auto-triage recent stats (how do we do more reviews) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Re: [DISCUSS] PR auto-triage recent stats (how do we do more reviews) Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Re: [DISCUSS] PR auto-triage recent stats (how do we do more reviews) Omkar P
• [VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Tzu-ping Chung via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Phani Kumar via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Zhe-You(Jason) Liu
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Stefan Wang
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Shivam Rastogi
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Aaron Chen
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Wei Lee
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Rahul Vats
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Aritra Basu
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Igor Kholopov via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Amogh Desai
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Kaxil Naik
  • Re: [VOTE] AIP-108: Java Task SDK and the Language Coordinator Layer Buğra Öztürk
• 💌 Airflow Summit 2026 - Program is ready! 👀 Teyza Ponce
• [PR] [INFRA] Set up default rulesets for default and release branches [airflow-mssql-migration] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] [INFRA] Set up default rulesets for default and release branches [airflow-mssql-migration] via GitHub
  • RE: [PR] [INFRA] Set up default rulesets for default and release branches [airflow-mssql-migration] Sameer Mesiah
• [LAZY CONSENSUS] Hand off apache/airflow-steward to Apache Magpie (former Steward) PMC Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Hand off apache/airflow-steward to Apache Magpie (former Steward) PMC Vikram Koka via dev
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Hand off apache/airflow-steward to Apache Magpie (former Steward) PMC Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Hand off apache/airflow-steward to Apache Magpie (former Steward) PMC Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Hand off apache/airflow-steward to Apache Magpie (former Steward) PMC Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Hand off apache/airflow-steward to Apache Magpie (former Steward) PMC Jarek Potiuk
• [LAZY CONSENSUS] Helm Chart 2.0 direction and continuation plan Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Helm Chart 2.0 direction and continuation plan Buğra Öztürk
• A new approach for version_compat.py? Ferruzzi, Dennis
  • Re: A new approach for version_compat.py? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: A new approach for version_compat.py? Ferruzzi, Dennis
  • Re: A new approach for version_compat.py? Jarek Potiuk
• [REMINDER] i18n phrases for Airflow 3.2.2 patch release (v3-2-test) Rahul Vats
  • Fwd: [REMINDER] i18n phrases for Airflow 3.2.2 patch release (v3-2-test) Rahul Vats
  • Re: [REMINDER] i18n phrases for Airflow 3.2.2 patch release (v3-2-test) Jarek Potiuk
• Airflow Meetup in Warsaw on 21st of May! Eugen Kosteev
• [DISCUSS] New Ruff rule to enforce explicit multiple_outputs when a task outputs a dict Dev-iL
  • Re: [DISCUSS] New Ruff rule to enforce explicit multiple_outputs when a task outputs a dict Wei Lee
  • Re: [DISCUSS] New Ruff rule to enforce explicit multiple_outputs when a task outputs a dict Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] New Ruff rule to enforce explicit multiple_outputs when a task outputs a dict Blain David
  • Re: [DISCUSS] New Ruff rule to enforce explicit multiple_outputs when a task outputs a dict Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] New Ruff rule to enforce explicit multiple_outputs when a task outputs a dict Przemysław Mirowski
  • Re: [DISCUSS] New Ruff rule to enforce explicit multiple_outputs when a task outputs a dict Aaron Chen
  • Re: [DISCUSS] New Ruff rule to enforce explicit multiple_outputs when a task outputs a dict Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [DISCUSS] New Ruff rule to enforce explicit multiple_outputs when a task outputs a dict Ephraim Anierobi
  • RE: [DISCUSS] New Ruff rule to enforce explicit multiple_outputs when a task outputs a dict Dev-iL
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Providers prepared on 2026-05-05 are released Beck, Vincent
• [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release preparation date 2026-05-05 Vincent Beck
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release preparation date 2026-05-05 Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release preparation date 2026-05-05 Jarek Potiuk
• [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Omkar P
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Dev-iL
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Omkar P
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Philippe Gagnon via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design André Ahlert
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Omkar P
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Ash Berlin-Taylor
  • RE: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Sameer Mesiah
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Omkar P
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Airflow error codes (AERR) design Omkar P
• [DISCUSS] New AIP-XX: AIP-85-1: DAG importer Igor Kholopov via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] New AIP-XX: AIP-85-1: DAG importer Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] New AIP-XX: AIP-85-1: DAG importer Dilnaz Amanzholova via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] New AIP-XX: AIP-85-1: DAG importer Dilnaz Amanzholova via dev
• PyCon Busan 2026(Korea) - Apache Airflow Session & Community Booth Yeonguk Choo
  • Re: PyCon Busan 2026(Korea) - Apache Airflow Session & Community Booth Amogh Desai
  • Re: PyCon Busan 2026(Korea) - Apache Airflow Session & Community Booth Yeonguk Choo
• Introducing the TypeScript Task SDK (initial PR - 66289) Shivam Rastogi
  • Re: Introducing the TypeScript Task SDK (initial PR - 66289) Jens Scheffler
  • Re: Introducing the TypeScript Task SDK (initial PR - 66289) Rahul Vats
  • Re: Introducing the TypeScript Task SDK (initial PR - 66289) Shivam Rastogi
  • Re: Introducing the TypeScript Task SDK (initial PR - 66289) Zhe-You(Jason) Liu
• [REMINDER]: Airflow Dev call on 7th May - agenda Vikram Koka via dev
• [LAZY CONSENSUS] Helm Chart Refurbish: Kustomize overlays structure Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Helm Chart Refurbish: Kustomize overlays structure Buğra Öztürk
• [LAZY CONSENSUS] airflowctl parameter style: positional vs named arguments Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] airflowctl parameter style: positional vs named arguments Buğra Öztürk
• [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-05 Beck, Vincent
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-05 Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-05 Wei Lee
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-05 Buğra Öztürk
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-05 Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-05 Rahul Vats
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-05 Amogh Desai
  • Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers, release preparation date 2026-05-05 Shahar Epstein
• [DISCUSS] Maintainer PR dashboard prototype + next-round triage update Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Maintainer PR dashboard prototype + next-round triage update Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Maintainer PR dashboard prototype + next-round triage update Aaron Chen
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow CTL 0.1.4 from 0.1.4rc3 released Jarek Potiuk
• [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Ctl - release 0.1.4 from 0.1.4rc3 Jarek Potiuk
• [LAZY CONSENSUS] Simplifying the new community provider acceptance process Elad Kalif
  • Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] Simplifying the new community provider acceptance process Elad Kalif
• Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Jens Scheffler
  • Re: Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Aritra Basu
  • Re: Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Amogh Desai
  • Re: Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Rich Bowen
  • Re: Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Pratiksha Badheka
  • Re: Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Rich Bowen
  • Re: Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: Hackathon at Community Over Code Glasgow 2026 — Airflow in? Stefan Wang
• [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub gui
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub Shahar Epstein
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub Piyush Mudgal
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub gui
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub Jarek Potiuk
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub Vincent Beck
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub gui
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub Wei Lee
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add RST linter to prevent broken RST rendering on GitHub John Williams
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Airflow Providers prepared on 2026-04-26 are released Shahar Epstein
• [RESULT][VOTE] Airflow Providers - release preparation date 2026-04-26 Shahar Epstein
• [RESULT] April 2026 PR of the Month Briana Steel via dev
• [ANNOUNCE] May 2026 Airflow Monthly Town Hall Recording Briana Steel via dev
• [DISCUSS] Allow manual/operator-triggered DAG runs with future logical_date Mingjie Zhao
• [DISCUSS] Add Variable.list() to Task SDK as a replacement for Variable.all() 김준영
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add Variable.list() to Task SDK as a replacement for Variable.all() Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add Variable.list() to Task SDK as a replacement for Variable.all() 김준영
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add Variable.list() to Task SDK as a replacement for Variable.all() Jens Scheffler
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add Variable.list() to Task SDK as a replacement for Variable.all() 김준영
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Add Variable.list() to Task SDK as a replacement for Variable.all() Amogh Desai

• Earlier messages
• Later messages