That looks like a nice improvement. J.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 10:04 PM Malthe <mbo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 at 15:27, Constance Martineau > <consta...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > > Am intrigued. Curious about dynamic dag pattern, where you create the DAG > > object in a create_dag function and adding the DAG to globals. Would this > > new way prevent someone from modifying the dag object within the function, > > or returning it? > > It would not change the current way of programming DAGs. The only > change is that if you call the DAG constructor (or a function that > does so including one using the @dag decorator), then that DAG will be > made available regardless of whether you assign it a top-level > variable or not. > > Cheers
