On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 at 15:27, Constance Martineau <consta...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > Am intrigued. Curious about dynamic dag pattern, where you create the DAG > object in a create_dag function and adding the DAG to globals. Would this new > way prevent someone from modifying the dag object within the function, or > returning it?
It would not change the current way of programming DAGs. The only change is that if you call the DAG constructor (or a function that does so including one using the @dag decorator), then that DAG will be made available regardless of whether you assign it a top-level variable or not. Cheers
