Wow, the new demo UI is super slick and awesome. Great work Ryan and
Brent.  👏

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 2:59 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:

> For whatever reason there was an ".invalid" added to your address in
> reply, so let me just resend it :)
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:28 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
>> Great description. I have not had time to read it in detail - (added to
>> weekend reading list :) ). But it looks great and it's clear you put
>> enormous effort into that. The technology stack choice, tooling, test
>> support, architecture all look very sound in the proposal at the first
>> glance.
>>
>> Just a personal comment - It's a pity I will not have a lot of time to
>> contribute to it :(. React has gone a long way and matured a lot since we
>> pioneered it in Polidea (we were rather deeply vested in React Native for
>> mobile Apps). You can see my talk from 2015 at Mobile Warsaw from early
>> days of it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3dz3OF81EE - it was already
>> good then, but it is a fully matured ecosystem now, and a great choice as a
>> technology.
>>
>> Great piece of AIP Ryan and Brent.
>>
>> This will be a huge effort to complete, but I am 100% sure it's worth it.
>>
>> J.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 5:02 PM Ryan Hamilton
>> <ryan.hamil...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Team,
>>>
>>> We just created “AIP-38 Modern Web Application”' on Confluence and would
>>> very much appreciate feedback and suggestions from the community.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-38+Modern+Web+Application
>>>
>>> Building on the momentum of the release of 2.0 and the interest
>>> generated by the UI refresh delivered by it, we feel the time is right to
>>> begin the journey in making (and keeping) Airflow’s web application a truly
>>> modern one. We outline our motivations in detail within the AIP, but
>>> ultimately we strive to deliver a world-class user experience that
>>> strengthens Airflow’s position as the leader for data orchestration.
>>>
>>> The AIP consists of two primary sections: Technology and Information
>>> Architecture & Design. While the former has a fairly straightforward
>>> specification of technology and a proof of concept, the latter may feel a
>>> bit unorthodox as far as Airflow AIPs go. We are confident that the process
>>> that we’ve proposed to support it will fully utilize the best design
>>> practices that will yield an evolved and elevated experience for Airflow’s
>>> users.
>>>
>>> We’re cognizant of the significant amount of effort that this endeavour
>>> will require, and the ultimate impact that it will have on the future of
>>> Airflow. We believe that the proposed community-supported design process,
>>> and the introduction path with continual feedback loops will ensure that
>>> the end result fully delivers on the needs of Airflow’s diverse community
>>> of users.
>>>
>>> Any feedback, suggestions, and comments would be greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Ryan Hamilton and Brent Bovenzi
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> +48 660 796 129
>>
>
>
> --
> +48 660 796 129
>

Reply via email to