On 17/10/2018 10:12, James Graham wrote:
On 17/10/2018 01:23, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote:
Hi Philip,

Do you know how do reftests run in order to get that data?

I'm particularly curious about this Firefox-only failure:

   css/selectors/selection-image-001.html

It passes both on our automation and locally. I'm curious because I was the author of that test (whoops) and the Firefox fix (bug 1449010).

Does it use the same mechanism than our automation to wait for image decodes and such? Is there any way to see the test images?

It's using the same harness as we use in gecko, so it should be giving the same results, but of course it's possible that there's some difference in the configuration that could cause different results for some tests.

Unfortunately there isn't yet a way to see the images; because of the number of failures per run, and the number of runs, putting all the screenshots in the logs would be prohibitively large, but there is a plan to start uploading previously unseen screenshots to wpt.fyi [1]

OK, I investigated this and it turns out that we accidentally started uploading tbpl-style logs with screenshots for full runs when we turned on taskcluster for PRs. So the screenshot is available through

https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/raw-file/tip/layout/tools/reftest/reftest-analyzer.xhtml#logurl=https://taskcluster-artifacts.net/U6OIGr7ZTjurDYjy_KgyCg/0/public/results/log_tbpl.log
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to