Re: PSA: Chrome-only WebIDL interfaces no longer require DOM peer review

[Cameron McCormack]

On Fri, Mar 9, 2018, at 8:41 AM, Bobby Holley wrote:
> The problem is precisely that it's gradual - a few kilobytes at a
> time, certainly nothing to trigger our alerts. Waiting for it all to
> pile up and then launching a herculean effort to move things _back_ to
> XPIDL would be a huge waste of time, which is why I'm trying to
> address the problem now.
How much effort would it be, and would it be worth it, to support Web
IDL argument conversion in a more dynamic way, like XPConnect does,
and then opt in to this for interfaces / methods we decide are not
performance critical?  (I'm guessing that it would be a fair amount
of effort.)
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform